Top 10 US ZIP Codes by Median Home Value

American Community Survey housing data ranking US ZIP Code Tabulation Areas by median owner-occupied home value. Rendered server-side from a live SELECT joining zips and zip_housing.

Research period:

Compiled by Plainzip Editorial on 2026-07-08

Research question

Across the 32,000+ ZIP Code Tabulation Areas with reported housing data, which ZIPs report the highest median home values, and how do those values relate to the owner-occupancy rates and median rents in the same area?

Top 10 US ZIP Codes by Median Home Value

Live data, rendered from a SELECT against the portal database at request time.

median home value

What this shows The highest-value ZIPs cluster in a handful of coastal metros, where owner-occupancy is often lower than the national norm, so the median reflects a small, expensive owner subset.

Source U.S. Census Bureau · ACS 5-Year Estimates As of 2019–2023

How we built this ranking

ZIPs are ranked by median home value, and the top 10 are returned. Every figure on this page is drawn directly from the current dataset (nothing is hardcoded), so when the U.S. Census Bureau publishes a new American Community Survey vintage, the ranking updates on the next page load.

Values are stored exactly as the Census Bureau exports them, preserving the original unit; we format dollars for display only. Rows with a null or suppressed value are excluded rather than shown as zero, so the ranking never surfaces low-information records ahead of complete ones, and genuine outliers are shown as published rather than silently clipped.

Two cautions when reading this list. ACS reports the value owners estimate their homes would sell for, not recent transaction prices, so a fast-appreciating ZIP can lag the live market by months. And a ZIP with very few owner-occupied homes can post an extreme median driven by a handful of high-value properties, which is why we surface the owner-occupancy rate next to each ZIP in the table below so you can judge how representative the figure is.

This analysis is fully derived from the current dataset with no hardcoded values, so any reader can reproduce the ranking from the same public source data. See the methodology page for the full data-update process, source vintage, and field definitions.

The ranked top 10

Every row below reflects the current dataset of 10 qualifying records. Figures update automatically as the source data is refreshed.

# ZIP City State Median home value Median rent Owner-occupied %
1 10007 New York NY $2.0M $3,501 30.4%
2 10013 New York NY $2.0M $2,598 30.1%
3 10069 New York NY $2.0M $3,501 28.4%
4 10282 New York NY $2.0M $3,501 10.6%
5 11568 Old Westbury NY $2.0M $3,501 93.7%
6 11765 Mill Neck NY $2.0M $3,501 82.5%
7 11975 Wainscott NY $2.0M $0 92.9%
8 11976 Water Mill NY $2.0M $3,250 93.2%
9 21056 Gibson Island MD $2.0M $0 100.0%
10 29482 Sullivans Island SC $2.0M $2,375 85.3%

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Housing Estimates. Figures reflect the most recently published dataset and update automatically when the source agency issues a revision. U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Housing Estimates. Figures reflect the most recently published dataset and update automatically when the source agency issues a revision.

Findings

Top entity in the ranking

The top-ranked record in this dataset is 10007, with a value of $2.0M on the Median home value column. The full top-10 set is rendered in the table above. Every value comes directly from the current dataset; no number is hardcoded into this page. When the U.S. Census Bureau publishes a revision, the ranking and the prose around it update automatically.

Distribution shape

The gap between the top-ranked record ($2.0M) and the 10th-ranked record ($2.0M) characterizes how concentrated the top of the distribution is. Where the top value is many multiples of the median value of the visible set, the population is highly concentrated, a small number of entities accumulate the bulk of the measured quantity. Where the top and bottom of the visible set are close together, the distribution is relatively flat across the top end. The full distribution beyond this top-10 cut is summarized in the aggregate context section below and explored in the linked entity profiles.

Aggregate context

Across the full population behind this ranking, here are the summary statistics: how many records exist in total, the sum of the ranking metric across all qualifying records, and the mean per-record value. The methodology page documents the exact filter applied (records with null or zero values on the ranking metric are excluded). This aggregate row is computed from the same dataset that powers the ranking above.

Source provenance

The records in this ranking originate from U.S. Census Bureau, specifically the American Community Survey 5-Year Housing Estimates. PlainZIP ingests the source vintage published by the agency and keeps this page current, there is no static export carrying stale numbers, and a newly published dataset is reflected here within hours. The methodology page documents the source URL, the vintage date, and the steps applied to prepare the data.

Why this ranking matters

Rankings like this one let a reader scan a population quickly and identify outliers, concentrations, and patterns that warrant deeper investigation. The detail pages linked from each entity in the table above give the full per-entity context: time-series history where available, related metrics from adjacent tables, and links onward to the underlying source records. The methodology page explains how an entity earns inclusion in the dataset and how the ranking column is computed at the source.

What this analysis cannot tell us

ACS median home value reflects owner-reported estimates of what owner-occupied housing units would sell for, rather than recent transaction prices. Estimates are 5-year rolling averages, so a ZIP that has experienced rapid price appreciation will lag the actual current market by months to years. ZIPs with very small numbers of owner-occupied homes can show extreme figures driven by a handful of high-value properties. Owner-occupancy rates can be very low in destination resort markets or dense urban districts; in those cases the median home value reflects the small owner-occupied subset rather than the broader housing stock. Cross-ZIP comparisons of nominal home values do not account for lot size, structure square footage, or year built, three ZIPs at the same median value can reflect very different physical housing stock.

Secondary cut: highest median rents

Top 10 ZIPs by median monthly gross rent (population over 100), from the same ACS housing table.

median monthly rent

What this shows High-rent ZIPs overlap with, but are not identical to, the high home-value list, a sign of where renting stays expensive even outside the priciest ownership markets.

Source U.S. Census Bureau · ACS 5-Year Estimates As of 2019–2023

Sources