Oakley, UT
Single-footprint Census roll-up for Oakley, UT: 1 USPS ZIP, population 1,406. Open the primary ZIP for household income, housing tenure, and commute from ACS 2023 5-Year Estimates.
U.S. Census Bureau, SimpleMaps US ZIP Code Database, delivery-area ZIP coverage
ACS city ledger plate
Sheet OAKLEY-UT · Oakley, UT 1 ZIPs · 1,406 pop · #1774/25278 · Summit County
INC-TOP · RANK-TOP · ABOVE-PEER · BOOK-ONE · OWN-HIGH · POP-VILLAGE · SPREAD-UNK · HOME-HIGH
- INC-TOP $126,071
- RANK-TOP #1774/25278
- ABOVE-PEER over Kamas
- BOOK-ONE 1 ZIP
- OWN-HIGH 92% owners
- POP-VILLAGE 1,406
- SPREAD-UNK Single-ZIP book
- HOME-HIGH $677,000
Nearest income peer: Kamas, UT ( $5,302 income $)
Instrument codes from this city’s ACS household income, national rank, county-peer gap, ZIP book, owner tenure, population scale, intra-city income spread, and home-value band, not a moving recommendation.
Income neighbourhood around Oakley
Lowest/highest poles plus county-sharing cities nearest Oakley on average ZIP median household income. Full ladder: /cities.
- Henefer · lowest
Henefer · lowest
$94,038 median HH income
- Coalville · near
Coalville · near
$95,900 median HH income
- Kamas · near
Kamas · near
$120,769 median HH income
- Oakley · this city
Oakley · this city
$126,071 median HH income
- Park City · near
Park City · near
$151,207 median HH income
- Peoa · highest
Peoa · highest
$177,500 median HH income
What this shows County-sharing peers only, not the full US city board. Open a near peer when the gap is small; open the poles when the mosaic is wide.
National city placement
According to ACS 5-Year Estimates, Oakley, UT sits among US cities with a top-decile household income, on a village-scale population base, across a single-ZIP footprint.
- Top 7%
- household income vs 25,278 US cities
- 1,406
- city population (Census)
- 1
- USPS ZIP codes covered
- $126,071
- avg ZIP median income
Income percentile ranks this city's average ZIP median household income against 25,278 US cities with ACS income on at least one ZIP. Scale and ZIP-spread words come from Census population and USPS ZIP coverage.
High-income footprint on only 1 ZIP: the city page and the ZIP page nearly coincide. Headline income $126,071 and home value $677,000 should be read as near-neighborhood numbers ; bachelor's attainment averages 42.5%.
Owner-occupancy here runs high (91.5%) - tenure is stable enough that the ZIP detail's owner share is the right next click, not a renter-heavy compare.
Within Utah, Tridell is the closest lower-income city and Wallsburg the closest higher-income city by average ZIP household income. Their 1 and 1 ZIP footprints are the immediate statewide comparison set for Oakley.
Population concentration
One ZIP, 84055, is all of Oakley
There is no split to weigh here: 84055 holds every one of Oakley's 1,406 ACS residents. City-level and ZIP-level numbers on this site are the same number twice, check the ZIP page for the income/tenure/commute breakdown.
Census ZBP business roll-up
Dense ZBP book packed into Oakley's one ZIP
Citywide ZBP: 63 establishments, 392 employees , annual payroll $18,232k (~45 establishments per 1,000 residents) across 1 of 1 ZIPs. Peak business ZIP 84055 (63 units) ; leading NAICS Construction (24) · also Professional, scientific, and technical services · Administrative and support and waste management and remediation services .
ZIP Codes in Oakley, UT
These ZIP codes sit in Summit County, which covers 8 ZIP codes in all; 1 of them fall in Oakley. See the Summit County roll-up →
Oakley lands mid-pack among the 5 cities sharing Summit County: Park City and Peoa earn more and Kamas, Coalville and Henefer earn less. Peoa marks the far end of that range at $177,500, 41% above Oakley.
| ZIP Code | Population | Median income | Establishments | Density |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 84055 | 1,406 | $126,071 | 63 | 4 |
Oakley roll-ups here are for informational purposes only and do not constitute financial or relocation advice. ACS and Census ZBP figures are estimates; confirm the current table against Census before a money or move decision involving Oakley, .