ZIP 00966 vs ZIP 00934

This side-by-side compares ZIP 00966 (Guaynabo, PR) and ZIP 00934 (Fort Buchanan, PR) using the same Census ACS 5-Year table fields for both — no averages swapped in, no national proxies. ZIP 00966 has a population of 16,676 at 2,000 people per square mile, while ZIP 00934 has 288 at 148 per square mile. That difference in population size and density alone reshapes how every other metric should be interpreted — a higher-income ZIP with 1,200 residents behaves very differently from one with 45,000.

On income and education, ZIP 00966 reports a median household income of $60,203 against — in ZIP 00934, with per-capita income of $41,979 vs —. The share of adults holding a bachelor's degree or higher is 70.0% in 00966 and 50.0% in 00934. Poverty rate reads 20.1% vs 0.0%, and unemployment 8.5% vs 0.0% — these four fields alone drive most of the difference in the scorecard grades you will see for each ZIP.

Housing separates these two ZIPs further: median home value sits at $300,900 in 00966 versus — in 00934, with median rent of $1,121 and — per month respectively. Homeownership rate is 72.9% vs 0.0%. When reading the comparison table below, focus on paired metrics rather than single winners — a ZIP with lower home values and lower income is not strictly "worse" if rent-to-income ratios and commute times land in the same zone. Every value is pulled from the exact same ACS table so the two columns are genuinely comparable.