ZIP 02921 vs ZIP 02920

This side-by-side compares ZIP 02921 (Cranston, RI) and ZIP 02920 (Cranston, RI) using the same Census ACS 5-Year table fields for both — no averages swapped in, no national proxies. ZIP 02921 has a population of 12,361 at 363 people per square mile, while ZIP 02920 has 37,547 at 1,577 per square mile. That difference in population size and density alone reshapes how every other metric should be interpreted — a higher-income ZIP with 1,200 residents behaves very differently from one with 45,000.

On income and education, ZIP 02921 reports a median household income of $147,204 against $80,717 in ZIP 02920, with per-capita income of $66,223 vs $39,905. The share of adults holding a bachelor's degree or higher is 52.6% in 02921 and 32.3% in 02920. Poverty rate reads 5.8% vs 11.3%, and unemployment 2.2% vs 6.7% — these four fields alone drive most of the difference in the scorecard grades you will see for each ZIP.

Housing separates these two ZIPs further: median home value sits at $535,800 in 02921 versus $370,000 in 02920, with median rent of $1,411 and $1,294 per month respectively. Homeownership rate is 85.3% vs 63.8%. When reading the comparison table below, focus on paired metrics rather than single winners — a ZIP with lower home values and lower income is not strictly "worse" if rent-to-income ratios and commute times land in the same zone. Every value is pulled from the exact same ACS table so the two columns are genuinely comparable.