ZIP 25508 vs ZIP 25601

This side-by-side compares ZIP 25508 (Chapmanville, WV) and ZIP 25601 (Logan, WV) using the same Census ACS 5-Year table fields for both, no averages swapped in, no national proxies. ZIP 25508 has a population of 9,837 at 49 people per square mile, while ZIP 25601 has 5,206 at 102 per square mile. That difference in population size and density alone reshapes how every other metric should be interpreted, a higher-income ZIP with 1,200 residents behaves very differently from one with 45,000.

On income and education, ZIP 25508 reports a median household income of $48,144 against $47,333 in ZIP 25601, with per-capita income of $32,560 vs $28,585. The share of adults holding a bachelor's degree or higher is 18.8% in 25508 and 18.8% in 25601. Poverty rate reads 21.1% vs 23.6%, and unemployment 6.0% vs 10.9% - these four fields alone drive most of the difference in the scorecard grades you will see for each ZIP.

Housing separates these two ZIPs further: median home value sits at $133,900 in 25508 versus $94,900 in 25601, with median rent of $684 and $819 per month respectively. Homeownership rate is 78.4% vs 65.4%. When reading the comparison table below, focus on paired metrics rather than single winners, a ZIP with lower home values and lower income is not strictly "worse" if rent-to-income ratios and commute times land in the same zone. Every value is pulled from the exact same ACS table so the two columns are genuinely comparable.