ZIP 59525 vs ZIP 59528

This side-by-side compares ZIP 59525 (Gildford, MT) and ZIP 59528 (Hingham, MT) using the same Census ACS 5-Year table fields for both — no averages swapped in, no national proxies. ZIP 59525 has a population of 384 at 0 people per square mile, while ZIP 59528 has 208 at 1 per square mile. That difference in population size and density alone reshapes how every other metric should be interpreted — a higher-income ZIP with 1,200 residents behaves very differently from one with 45,000.

On income and education, ZIP 59525 reports a median household income of $48,438 against $89,375 in ZIP 59528, with per-capita income of $20,188 vs $48,608. The share of adults holding a bachelor's degree or higher is 12.6% in 59525 and 35.1% in 59528. Poverty rate reads 47.1% vs 4.4%, and unemployment 6.5% vs 0.8% — these four fields alone drive most of the difference in the scorecard grades you will see for each ZIP.

Housing separates these two ZIPs further: median home value sits at $94,300 in 59525 versus $170,800 in 59528, with median rent of $605 and — per month respectively. Homeownership rate is 80.2% vs 81.0%. When reading the comparison table below, focus on paired metrics rather than single winners — a ZIP with lower home values and lower income is not strictly "worse" if rent-to-income ratios and commute times land in the same zone. Every value is pulled from the exact same ACS table so the two columns are genuinely comparable.