ZIP 59528 vs ZIP 59525

This side-by-side compares ZIP 59528 (Hingham, MT) and ZIP 59525 (Gildford, MT) using the same Census ACS 5-Year table fields for both — no averages swapped in, no national proxies. ZIP 59528 has a population of 208 at 1 people per square mile, while ZIP 59525 has 384 at 0 per square mile. That difference in population size and density alone reshapes how every other metric should be interpreted — a higher-income ZIP with 1,200 residents behaves very differently from one with 45,000.

On income and education, ZIP 59528 reports a median household income of $89,375 against $48,438 in ZIP 59525, with per-capita income of $48,608 vs $20,188. The share of adults holding a bachelor's degree or higher is 35.1% in 59528 and 12.6% in 59525. Poverty rate reads 4.4% vs 47.1%, and unemployment 0.8% vs 6.5% — these four fields alone drive most of the difference in the scorecard grades you will see for each ZIP.

Housing separates these two ZIPs further: median home value sits at $170,800 in 59528 versus $94,300 in 59525, with median rent of — and $605 per month respectively. Homeownership rate is 81.0% vs 80.2%. When reading the comparison table below, focus on paired metrics rather than single winners — a ZIP with lower home values and lower income is not strictly "worse" if rent-to-income ratios and commute times land in the same zone. Every value is pulled from the exact same ACS table so the two columns are genuinely comparable.