ZIP 81611 vs ZIP 81612

This side-by-side compares ZIP 81611 (Aspen, CO) and ZIP 81612 (Aspen, CO) using the same Census ACS 5-Year table fields for both — no averages swapped in, no national proxies. ZIP 81611 has a population of 9,921 at 9 people per square mile, while ZIP 81612 has 20 at 3 per square mile. That difference in population size and density alone reshapes how every other metric should be interpreted — a higher-income ZIP with 1,200 residents behaves very differently from one with 45,000.

On income and education, ZIP 81611 reports a median household income of $82,664 against — in ZIP 81612, with per-capita income of $115,065 vs —. The share of adults holding a bachelor's degree or higher is 67.7% in 81611 and — in 81612. Poverty rate reads 9.5% vs —, and unemployment 2.1% vs — — these four fields alone drive most of the difference in the scorecard grades you will see for each ZIP.

Housing separates these two ZIPs further: median home value sits at $988,000 in 81611 versus — in 81612, with median rent of $1,959 and — per month respectively. Homeownership rate is 58.6% vs —. When reading the comparison table below, focus on paired metrics rather than single winners — a ZIP with lower home values and lower income is not strictly "worse" if rent-to-income ratios and commute times land in the same zone. Every value is pulled from the exact same ACS table so the two columns are genuinely comparable.