ZIP 81612 vs ZIP 81611

This side-by-side compares ZIP 81612 (Aspen, CO) and ZIP 81611 (Aspen, CO) using the same Census ACS 5-Year table fields for both — no averages swapped in, no national proxies. ZIP 81612 has a population of 20 at 3 people per square mile, while ZIP 81611 has 9,921 at 9 per square mile. That difference in population size and density alone reshapes how every other metric should be interpreted — a higher-income ZIP with 1,200 residents behaves very differently from one with 45,000.

On income and education, ZIP 81612 reports a median household income of — against $82,664 in ZIP 81611, with per-capita income of — vs $115,065. The share of adults holding a bachelor's degree or higher is — in 81612 and 67.7% in 81611. Poverty rate reads — vs 9.5%, and unemployment — vs 2.1% — these four fields alone drive most of the difference in the scorecard grades you will see for each ZIP.

Housing separates these two ZIPs further: median home value sits at — in 81612 versus $988,000 in 81611, with median rent of — and $1,959 per month respectively. Homeownership rate is — vs 58.6%. When reading the comparison table below, focus on paired metrics rather than single winners — a ZIP with lower home values and lower income is not strictly "worse" if rent-to-income ratios and commute times land in the same zone. Every value is pulled from the exact same ACS table so the two columns are genuinely comparable.