ZIP 84521 vs ZIP 84518

This side-by-side compares ZIP 84521 (Elmo, UT) and ZIP 84518 (Cleveland, UT) using the same Census ACS 5-Year table fields for both — no averages swapped in, no national proxies. ZIP 84521 has a population of 840 at 6 people per square mile, while ZIP 84518 has 702 at 4 per square mile. That difference in population size and density alone reshapes how every other metric should be interpreted — a higher-income ZIP with 1,200 residents behaves very differently from one with 45,000.

On income and education, ZIP 84521 reports a median household income of $49,583 against $73,594 in ZIP 84518, with per-capita income of $29,353 vs $55,134. The share of adults holding a bachelor's degree or higher is 21.5% in 84521 and 16.9% in 84518. Poverty rate reads 4.8% vs 4.2%, and unemployment 1.8% vs 0.0% — these four fields alone drive most of the difference in the scorecard grades you will see for each ZIP.

Housing separates these two ZIPs further: median home value sits at $227,900 in 84521 versus $187,500 in 84518, with median rent of $714 and $1,023 per month respectively. Homeownership rate is 80.1% vs 79.8%. When reading the comparison table below, focus on paired metrics rather than single winners — a ZIP with lower home values and lower income is not strictly "worse" if rent-to-income ratios and commute times land in the same zone. Every value is pulled from the exact same ACS table so the two columns are genuinely comparable.