ZIP 98367 vs ZIP 98329

This side-by-side compares ZIP 98367 (Port Orchard, WA) and ZIP 98329 (Gig Harbor, WA) using the same Census ACS 5-Year table fields for both — no averages swapped in, no national proxies. ZIP 98367 has a population of 27,693 at 133 people per square mile, while ZIP 98329 has 10,545 at 158 per square mile. That difference in population size and density alone reshapes how every other metric should be interpreted — a higher-income ZIP with 1,200 residents behaves very differently from one with 45,000.

On income and education, ZIP 98367 reports a median household income of $115,482 against $110,316 in ZIP 98329, with per-capita income of $52,337 vs $48,833. The share of adults holding a bachelor's degree or higher is 32.6% in 98367 and 31.6% in 98329. Poverty rate reads 6.8% vs 4.8%, and unemployment 4.5% vs 4.6% — these four fields alone drive most of the difference in the scorecard grades you will see for each ZIP.

Housing separates these two ZIPs further: median home value sits at $565,100 in 98367 versus $518,700 in 98329, with median rent of $1,855 and $1,755 per month respectively. Homeownership rate is 85.2% vs 89.2%. When reading the comparison table below, focus on paired metrics rather than single winners — a ZIP with lower home values and lower income is not strictly "worse" if rent-to-income ratios and commute times land in the same zone. Every value is pulled from the exact same ACS table so the two columns are genuinely comparable.