ZIP 98353 vs ZIP 98366

This side-by-side compares ZIP 98353 (Manchester, WA) and ZIP 98366 (Port Orchard, WA) using the same Census ACS 5-Year table fields for both — no averages swapped in, no national proxies. ZIP 98353 has a population of 4 at 2 people per square mile, while ZIP 98366 has 34,258 at 571 per square mile. That difference in population size and density alone reshapes how every other metric should be interpreted — a higher-income ZIP with 1,200 residents behaves very differently from one with 45,000.

On income and education, ZIP 98353 reports a median household income of — against $92,011 in ZIP 98366, with per-capita income of — vs $45,305. The share of adults holding a bachelor's degree or higher is — in 98353 and 27.6% in 98366. Poverty rate reads — vs 9.3%, and unemployment — vs 3.5% — these four fields alone drive most of the difference in the scorecard grades you will see for each ZIP.

Housing separates these two ZIPs further: median home value sits at — in 98353 versus $475,800 in 98366, with median rent of — and $1,738 per month respectively. Homeownership rate is — vs 69.3%. When reading the comparison table below, focus on paired metrics rather than single winners — a ZIP with lower home values and lower income is not strictly "worse" if rent-to-income ratios and commute times land in the same zone. Every value is pulled from the exact same ACS table so the two columns are genuinely comparable.