ZIP 95206 vs ZIP 95207

This side-by-side compares ZIP 95206 (Stockton, CA) and ZIP 95207 (Stockton, CA) using the same Census ACS 5-Year table fields for both — no averages swapped in, no national proxies. ZIP 95206 has a population of 65,004 at 173 people per square mile, while ZIP 95207 has 47,965 at 2,552 per square mile. That difference in population size and density alone reshapes how every other metric should be interpreted — a higher-income ZIP with 1,200 residents behaves very differently from one with 45,000.

On income and education, ZIP 95206 reports a median household income of $83,432 against $69,455 in ZIP 95207, with per-capita income of $26,349 vs $34,056. The share of adults holding a bachelor's degree or higher is 12.0% in 95206 and 21.2% in 95207. Poverty rate reads 17.0% vs 18.9%, and unemployment 7.8% vs 9.5% — these four fields alone drive most of the difference in the scorecard grades you will see for each ZIP.

Housing separates these two ZIPs further: median home value sits at $424,600 in 95206 versus $432,800 in 95207, with median rent of $1,592 and $1,648 per month respectively. Homeownership rate is 60.3% vs 41.6%. When reading the comparison table below, focus on paired metrics rather than single winners — a ZIP with lower home values and lower income is not strictly "worse" if rent-to-income ratios and commute times land in the same zone. Every value is pulled from the exact same ACS table so the two columns are genuinely comparable.